Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home

Modified items

All recently modified items, latest first.
Conservation Strategy for Imperiled Aquatic Species in the UTRB by Jessica Rhodes, last updated: Jan 12, 2016 10:47 AM
The Strategy provides guidance to Field Offices in reevaluating current ("status quo") conservation approaches in order to deliver the most cost effective approach toward the conservation and management of imperiled freshwater fish and mussel species in the Upper Tennessee River Basin.
Publications & Outreach by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Jan 12, 2016 10:04 AM
A collection of our education, outreach, and workshop products along with other documents related to the work of the Appalachian LCC
Environmental Flows from Water Withdrawals in the Marcellus Shale Region by Web Editor, last updated: Jan 05, 2016 09:05 AM
 
A Stream Classification System for the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Jan 04, 2016 02:42 PM
Unifying state-based stream classifications into a single consistent system, principal investigators at The Nature Conservancy developed a hierarchical classification system and map for stream and river systems for the Appalachian LCC that represents the region’s natural flowing-water aquatic habitats. This river classification information is needed to develop and implement instream flow standards and management recommendations so that environmental flows can become integral to all water management decisions from the onset.
Review of Subterranean Faunal Studies of the Appalachians and Models of Subterranean Species Richness PDF by Web Editor, last updated: Jan 04, 2016 12:29 PM
Historically, the cave fauna, and any biota for that matter, were largely studied from a taxonomic perspective. Papers focused on a lineage or a set of closely related lineages because of the strictures of taxonomic expertise, the difficulty in collating and summarizing information for a variety of taxonomic groups, and because, until relatively recently, there was no research agenda that emphasized patterns of species richness. With the advent of interest in species diversity per se in the late 1960’s and especially with the interest in biodiversity and biodiversity hotspots in the late 1980’s, the focus changed. Studies of cave fauna reflected the changing research agendas. In this bibliographic review, we examine five areas of interest:
A Stream Classification for the Appalachian LCC PDF by Web Editor, last updated: Jan 04, 2016 12:11 PM
A classification system and map was developed for stream and river systems in the Appalachian LCC region, encompassing parts of 17 states. The product is intended to complement state-based stream classifications by unifying them into a single consistent system that represents the region’s natural flowing-water aquatic habitats. The results can be used to understand ecological flow relationships and inform conservation planning for aquatic biodiversity in the region.
Science Need Portfolio by Jean Brennan, last updated: Dec 28, 2015 01:01 PM
Background Materials for Workshop Participants
Info on Conservation Planning Atlas by mmallek, last updated: Dec 24, 2015 11:32 AM
 
Quick Start Guide to Core Networks On DataBasin by mmallek, last updated: Dec 24, 2015 11:31 AM
This document is intended to guide you through accessing the Terrestrial and Aquatic Core Networks, two of the datasets that comprise the Connect the Connecticut gallery of science products on Data Basin.
Cartwright, Jennifer by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Dec 22, 2015 05:32 PM
Dr. Cartwright is an ecologist and GIS analyst with experience in climate-change ecology, soil science, remote sensing, ecological flow analysis, and habitat for rare and endemic plants.
Interactive Conservation Planning by Web Editor, last updated: Dec 22, 2015 02:18 PM
The Appalachian LCC is currently engaged in an effort to develop a draft regional conservation plan for the Cooperative using an interactive and iterative spatial prioritization framework. Using available data and modeling approaches that are well supported in the literature, researchers from Clemson University are developing conservation planning models that include site selection, ecological threat assessments, and broad ranging habitat and ecological connectivity analyses.
Data Needs Assessment by Web Editor, last updated: Dec 22, 2015 02:17 PM
The Data Needs Assessment project was undertaken to evaluate existing data for the Appalachian LCC region, package relevant datasets, review commonly used conservation planning tools, provide interpretive text and graphics for datasets and tools, and identify data gaps that could improve conservation planning in the Appalachians. A suite of core conservation planning products and data from principal investigators at Clemson University are now available to the Cooperative.
AFS Image by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Dec 22, 2015 12:01 PM
For Newsletter Page
Brian Hazelwood, Brian Hazelwood by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Dec 22, 2015 11:09 AM
 
Data Needs Assessment by Matthew Cimitile, last updated: Dec 22, 2015 10:47 AM
The Data Needs Assessment research project was undertaken to review the variety of resources on conservation planning to provide packages of products, data, and identified data gaps to improve conservation planning in the Appalachian LCC. A suite of core conservation planning products and data from principal investigators at Clemson University are now available to the Cooperative.
Interpretive Text and Graphics for AppLCC Web Portal (data) by Data Needs Assessment Research Team, last updated: Dec 21, 2015 11:27 AM
This document presents map images and text that describes the data that can be posted to the AppLCC web portal. The arrangement follows the layout of the Appalachain Landscape Conservation Cooperative GIS Datasets.
Interpretive Text and Graphics for AppLCC Web Portal (conservation planning tools) by Data Needs Assessment Research Team, last updated: Dec 21, 2015 11:27 AM
We have provided some interpretation material and text for conservation planning tools. These programs have been grouped into broad, sometime overlapping purposes. These brief descriptions of the various conservation planning tools can be put up on the AppLCC web portal, for users to get an idea about the tools available and what purposes they could serve. We have alo provided other links, where users can get detailed information about the tool.
Make up of LCCs across the Country by States by Trishna Dutta, Rob Baldwin, last updated: Dec 21, 2015 11:27 AM
List of number of states within each LCC.
An Analysis of State Wildlife Action Plans in the Appalachian LCC by Rob Baldwin, last updated: Dec 21, 2015 11:26 AM
In this synthesis, we describe how the information contained in the individual State Wildlife Action Plans and conservation plans by other agencies can be linked together towards identifying opportunities to integrate state and local scale efforts into regional conservation framework for the AppLCC. Specifically, our aim was to quantify the objectivity and efforts across the 15 partner states. We are particularly interested in the commonalities of methodology and results across plans. Throughout the document, we integrate our previous efforts in this data needs assessment to figure out ways that state efforts can be upscaled to meet regional planning goals.
List of Conservation Planning Tools, Functions, and Relevance to AppLCC Conservation Planning Goals by Data Needs Assessment Research Team, last updated: Dec 21, 2015 11:25 AM
The number of conservation planning tools and approaches is a growing and dynamic field of research. Here, we present description and evaluation of 21 conservation planning tools. To reduce the complexity of the conservation planning tools we decided to take a functional-grouping approach. These six groups are: reserve planning, habitat connectivity, species distribution modeling and viability, planning process integration, threats and climate change. To do the review, we used our own knowledge of conservation planning software and approaches, surveyed the literature for references to published programs, and searched the internet for emerging programs. We have condensed this information into a table (Table 1) and used it as a springboard for further exploration and discussion.