Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home
159 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type
























New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File Literature Review of Freshwater Classification Frameworks
by The Nature Conservancy published Nov 03, 2014 last modified Aug 31, 2015 12:12 PM — filed under: , ,
Identifying aquatic ecosystems requires a classification of stream and lake features into recognizable entities or categories. Although a number of nationally recognized terrestrial community classifications exist, the most accepted being the National Vegetation Classification System (Grossman et al. 1998), currently there is no national or international standard for classifying aquatic communities or ecosystems. Despite the lack of a national aquatic community classification, aquatic ecosystem classifications and frameworks have been developed at a variety of spatial scales. Their goal is often to reflect the distribution of aqutic biological communities. These assemblages recur across the landscape under similar habitat conditions and ecological processes (Higgins et al. 2005). The methods used to develop aquatic ecosystem classifications vary widely, as do the biotic and abiotic variables considered in the classifications. The classifications generally fall into two broad categories: 1) taxonomic or bio-ecosystem classifications and 2) environmental or geo-physical ecosystem classifications (Rowe and Barnes 1994); however some classifications combine aspects of both.
Located in Projects / / Stream Classification System for the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative / Background Materials: A Stream Classification System for the Appalachian LCC
Project Octet Stream Barrens Topminnow , Barrier Construction for Invasive Gambusia
by Christin VanZant published Mar 13, 2017 last modified Mar 14, 2017 03:14 PM — filed under: , , ,
Reintroduction and management of a highly endemic and endangered species to the TN Barrens. Derived resources from this project include/will include data sets, general report, and news announcement.
Located in Projects
Project Bear Creek Mussel Recovery
by Christin VanZant published Mar 13, 2017 last modified Mar 14, 2017 03:21 PM — filed under: , , , , ,
Restoring mussel fauna
Located in Projects
Project Alabama Statewide Crayfish Survey
by Christin VanZant published Mar 13, 2017 last modified Aug 29, 2017 03:28 PM — filed under: , , , ,
Stuart McGergor - Geologial Survey of Alabama
Located in Projects
Project Alabama Statewide Fish IBI
by Christin VanZant published Mar 13, 2017 last modified Mar 20, 2017 02:01 PM — filed under: , , ,
Developing IBI's for strategic watersheds statewide. Derived resources will include data sets, imagery, maps, videos, and general and technical reports.
Located in Projects
Project Alligator Snapping Turtle Surveys and Genetics - Lower TN and MS River
by Christin VanZant published Mar 13, 2017 last modified Mar 14, 2017 01:21 PM — filed under: , , , , , ,
Dr. Josh Ennen, Aquatic Conservation Biologist, TN Aquarium Conservation Institute
Located in Projects
File Troff document Riparian Restoration Decision Support Tool Fact Sheet
by Jessica Rhodes published Aug 14, 2015 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , , , ,
An innovative web-based tool - funded by the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) and developed by researchers from the U.S. Forest Service and the University of Massachusetts - is allowing managers to rapidly identify high-priority riparian targets for restoration to make more resilient in preparation for changes in future climate. The Riparian Restoration Prioritization to Promote Climate Change Resilience (RPCCR) tool identifies vulnerable stream and riverbanks that lack tree cover and shade in coldwater stream habitats. By locating the best spots to plant trees in riparian zones, resource managers can provide shade that limits the amount of solar radiation heating the water and reduces the impacts from climate change. This well-established management strategy will benefit high-elevation, cold-water aquatic communities.
Located in Resources / How-To Guides and Handouts
Organization University of California, Davis
by Rosanne Hessmiller last modified Jun 27, 2025 03:53 PM — filed under: , , ,
Davis is the ultimate college town. It’s green, laid back and friendly. You can walk or bike from the main campus to the main street in a few blocks. College students fill up the tables at nearby restaurants and coffee shops with their laptops, homework and friends. The town of Davis helps our students thrive.
Located in LP Members / Organizations Search
Product American Black Duck Decision Support Tool
by Rhishja Cota published Nov 09, 2022 last modified Jul 26, 2023 12:14 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
The Atlantic Coast Joint Venture Black Duck Decision Support Tool (DST) helps to identify the exact number of acres to protect, restore or maintain at the small watershed scale. Through this tool, land managers can determine the best way to contribute to achieving black duck goals anywhere on the landscape.
Located in Information Materials / Research / Peer-reviewed Science
by Shem D. Unger, Olin E. Rhodes Jr, Trent M. Sutton, Rod N. Williams published Feb 10, 2023 last modified Jul 26, 2023 01:36 PM — filed under: , , , , ,
Conservation genetics is a powerful tool to assess the population structure of species and provides a framework for informing management of freshwater ecosystems. As lotic habitats become fragmented, the need to assess gene flow for species of conservation management becomes a priority. The eastern hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) is a large, fully aquatic paedamorphic salamander. Many populations are experiencing declines throughout their geographic range, yet the genetic ramifications of these declines are currently unknown. To this end, we examined levels of genetic variation and genetic structure at both range-wide and drainage (hierarchical) scales. We collected 1,203 individuals from 77 rivers throughout nine states from June 2007 to August 2011. Levels of genetic diversity were relatively high among all sampling locations. We detected significant genetic structure across populations (Fst values ranged from 0.001 between rivers within a single watershed to 0.218 between states). We identified two genetically differentiated groups at the range-wide scale: 1) the Ohio River drainage and 2) the Tennessee River drainage. An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on landscape-scale sampling of basins within the Tennessee River drainage revealed the majority of genetic variation (∼94–98%) occurs within rivers. Eastern hellbenders show a strong pattern of isolation by stream distance (IBSD) at the drainage level. Understanding levels of genetic variation and differentiation at multiple spatial and biological scales will enable natural resource managers to make more informed decisions and plan effective conservation strategies for cryptic, lotic species.
Located in Information Materials / Research / Peer-reviewed Science